Independent, unofficial site · Educational only, not financial advice · Some tutorials contain invite links; we may earn a commission · Eligibility, fees and availability are set by Gate
Sell pressure

Who Is Selling at Listing: Where Opening Sell Pressure Comes From

Article cover: Daxin Lounge flip-board title card reading "Who sells at the open"
The people holding coins at the opening bell are not one group, and they did not all get them at the same moment.

Trading opens and the first candle goes straight down. By the time you have switched to the order book, the first three price levels on the ask are already stacked and the number is falling faster than the page refreshes. The same question shows up in every chat at the same moment: who is selling?

That is the only question here. Nothing about whether you should sell, no price call, no decision made on your behalf. The job is narrow: take everyone who, at the instant trading opens, already has tokens sitting in an account and can hit sell, and sort them by when those tokens arrived. Different arrival times, different shapes of selling.

01Who is actually sitting on the ask in minute one

One premise first: selling requires tokens already credited to a spot account or a wallet. An allocation, a winning ticket, an eligibility tick — none of those are tokens. Until the balance is there, you do not exist in the order book.

Sorted by when the coins landed, three groups can normally sell on day one: people who won a paid subscription, people who farmed the token by staking, and people who received it for free. A fourth group — the project, the team, early investors — usually cannot sell that day at all, because their supply is still locked. It still belongs on the list, because a lot of the dread about future unlocks gets projected onto opening day, where it does not apply yet.

One kind of trade I leave out: the money that buys at the open and sells ten minutes later. It is loud in the volume figures, but those coins arrive and leave inside the same session; I count them as liquidity rather than as supply. What a market maker is doing on the book, meanwhile, is not something anyone outside can see, so this article does not guess at it.

02Subscription winners: everyone's balance appears at once

Start with the paid format, where participants commit real funds. It is the one most often mistaken for a lottery.

Gate's Launchpad FAQ describes allocation as a proportional calculation: your share is worked out from the total funds you committed during the subscription window as a proportion of the project's total committed funds; a second wording in the same page frames it as your hourly average locked amount against the project's average total. Either way the mechanism is the same — a pro-rata split, not a draw. Commit more, receive more, which means the sellers at the open necessarily include a few holding wildly different amounts from the rest.

Funds that do not convert into an allocation are not held hostage: the English-language version of the same page states that "any unsubscribed portion will also be unlocked and refunded to your spot account within 4 hours after the subscription period ends" (treat the current page and the announcement for that round as authoritative · checked 2026-09).

The line that actually sets the shape of the selling is the one about delivery: once payment is taken, the tokens are credited automatically to your spot account at the project's expected distribution time, and that time varies by project. So the winners do not trickle in one by one. Their balances all appear at the moment stated in the announcement, and the open follows either immediately or shortly after. Same tokens, same arrival instant, same trading pair: the ability to sell switches on for thousands of accounts in the same second.

03Stakers: the balance grows an hour at a time

The staking format delivers on a completely different rhythm. Gate's Launchpool FAQ (English version) says "hourly earnings will be distributed into users' spot accounts"; that the platform "will take multiple snapshots of personal staking amounts each hour and calculate the valid staking amount"; and that a stake can be redeemed before the pool ends, with the caveat that "early redemption may result in the loss of accrued rewards" (platform page as displayed · checked 2026-09).

Put those together and the picture is clear enough: a staker's balance of the new token grows hour by hour for as long as the pool runs. Three days of farming means three days of accumulation. By the time the trading pair exists, those coins have been sitting in the account for a while and are waiting on no distribution event at all.

Few people weigh this properly, and it sets the feel of that group's selling. There is no single second when everyone is suddenly funded, so there is no single-second impact; on the other hand, every one of those coins is sellable from the first tick, and a decent share of the people holding them have thought of the balance as mined yield rather than as a position they paid for.

04Free allocations: one sample that was actually counted

Tokens received for free have no cost basis. Nothing moral in that observation, just bookkeeping: with no entry price there is no such thing as being down on the trade, and the threshold for selling sits nowhere near where it sits for someone who paid.

Is there data? There is one counted sample. On 18 June 2024, The Block, citing on-chain data from Nansen, reported that among the top 10,000 addresses that received the ZK airdrop from the Ethereum layer-2 network, some 41.1% had completely sold their allocation, measured over the 24 hours after the token went live.

What that number is and isn't good for

One project, one analytics firm, one measurement in 2024. It is not a rule of thumb, it is not any exchange's data, and it cannot be used to estimate how much of some other token will be sold. I cite it for exactly one purpose: someone went and counted the first-day selling of a free allocation, so the effect has at least been measured once. I would not carry that 41.1% over to any other launch — a single sample does not make a pattern.

05The locked supply: a date, not a sell order

What the project, the team and the early investors hold usually cannot move on listing day; it is released in tranches on a schedule fixed in advance. Those release schedules are public information and third-party data sites list them per project with countdowns — a separate topic, not one this article opens up.

The distinction worth keeping: this group is not opening-day sell pressure at all; it sits on a set of later dates. Blur the two and you spend listing day afraid of something that has not happened, while missing the people who are genuinely selling into it. How much of the supply is out, and what today's price implies once the rest is counted, belongs to the homework you do before the event — I drew that boundary in what you can and can't check before a launch and will not repeat it here.

06Four groups, four shapes of selling

Side by side, the differences stop being abstract:

GroupWhen the tokens arriveSellable on day oneShape of the pressure
Subscription winnersCredited to spot in one go at the announced expected distribution timeYesConcentrated: the ability to sell switches on at one instant
StakersDistributed hourly through the eventYesDiffuse: already fully in hand before the open
Free recipientsPer the project's distribution announcementYesPossibly a large share on day one (one project was counted)
Locked supplyOn a pre-set release scheduleUsually notNot today — it sits on later dates

So "it dumped at the open" can describe two quite different events: a wave of sell orders that appears after one specific moment, or a steady seep that has been running since the first tick. From the chart both look like a red candle, and most people read them as the same thing.

How that very first trade price gets established is a separate layer again, and it is covered in how a new token's opening price gets set.

07Checkable beforehand, watchable only afterwards

This is the line I would draw hardest. Left of it, the answer is on a page you can open. Right of it, anyone who sounds certain is guessing.

Checkable before the event, from the platform's help pages and that round's announcement:

  • Which basis the allocation uses — committed funds, or hourly average locked amount.
  • How long unsuccessful funds take to come back, and which sentence states it.
  • When the tokens are distributed. The announcement gives an expected time that varies by project; do not carry last round's timing into this one.
  • How staking rewards are paid, how effective stake is measured, and whether the principal can be redeemed at will.
  • Whether the locked portion has a published release schedule.

Only watchable afterwards, never checkable: which accounts are selling, what fraction of their allocation went out, who is supplying the depth on the book, and what would make it disappear. No public source carries any of that.

And one sentence belongs here in the platform's own words, restated from the risk notice it carries on those pages: investing in digital assets carries high risk, prices can swing sharply, and you may lose your entire investment. Launch events are no exception.

08What this article does not answer

Whether to sell into the open once you are holding is not answered here, and neither is any price level — that is your own arithmetic and your own tolerance. Whether the whole exercise pays for itself at all, once allocation odds and locked-up capital are counted, is worked through in can you make money on launches.

On "who is selling", the best you can do is this: know which groups exist, know when each of them got their coins, and know which one you are in. Certainty past that point is not on offer.

What we checked for this piece

The platform rules above were verified against official documentation rather than by running the flow ourselves. On 2026-09-17 we read the Chinese-language versions of Gate's Launchpad FAQ and Launchpool FAQ — the allocation basis, refund window, delivery method, reward frequency and risk notice in sections 02, 03 and 07 all come from those two pages; we did not open the English-language versions for this piece, and an exchange help centre's language editions are separate documents rather than translations of each other. The on-chain figure in section 04 is The Block's 2024-06-18 report citing Nansen, a single project measured once; we did no arithmetic on it. Section 05 relies on a third-party unlock data site's public description of how release schedules work. We have not taken part in any specific round on anyone's behalf and make no call on any individual project. Rules and timings change — treat the platform page and the announcement in front of you as authoritative.

Sources

The allocation basis, refund window and delivery of subscribed tokens come from Gate's Launchpad FAQ; the hourly reward distribution, effective-stake snapshots and redemption terms come from Gate's Launchpool FAQ; both pages were read in their English-language editions and the quotations above are those pages' own wording. The risk warning at the end of section 07 is a restatement of the risk notice the platform carries on the same pages, not a quotation of the English text. The 41.1% in section 04 is from The Block's 18 June 2024 report citing Nansen. The description of scheduled unlocks in section 05 follows the public explanation on Tokenomist. No referral codes in any of these links. Verified 2026-09-17.